Every single decision impacting our lives since January 2020 has been based on two bits of information: RT-PCR testing rates for Covid-19 and Covid-19 death rates. What I learned about the PCR test stunned me, then infuriated me. I suspect you will feel the same.
Every link was checked prior to being added to this list. However, if the book burners have found a way to dispose of it, please let me know in the comments below.
January 18, 2021
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
The CDC admits the PCR is test meaningless – the information is on page 40 (Dec 2020)
“•Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
•The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.
•The performance of this test has not been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-nCoV.
•This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. “
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
Dr. Mike Yeadon: ‘Government are using a Covid-19 test with undeclared false positive rates.’
The former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon, has reissued his challenge to the Health Secretary Matt Hancock regarding the coronavirus testing. Speaking with Julia Hartley-Brewer, Dr. Yeadon said the governments are “using a test with an undeclared false positive rate.
https://rumble.com/vcb0i9-dr-mike-yeadon-government-are-using-a-covid-19-test-with-undeclared-false-p.html
Dr. Mike Yeadon wants those who have tested positive for coronavirus to be tested again to eliminate the possibility of the test being a false positive. More information: https://dreddymd.com/?s=coronavirus
The COVID-19 Test Wasn’t Meant for Detecting Viruses
“The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently the most commonly used COVID-19 test both in the US and globally. PCR was invented by Kary Mullis in 1985 but it was NOT invented with the purpose of detecting disease, it’s primary intended applications included biomedical research and criminal forensics. It is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely deceptive in the diagnosis of infectious diseases and the inventor himself argued against using PCR as a diagnostic tool for infections. “I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine,” warns Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer.”
https://delgadoprotocol.com/the-covid-19-test-wasnt-meant-for-detecting-viruses/
Kary Mullis explains why his PCR test is not a diagnostic test
“Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize for investing the PCR test but he campaigned hard to stop it being used as a diagnostic test for HIV. Same applied to why the PCR test shouldn’t be used for mass testing covid-19.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4
FDA & CDC Finally Admit That Covid-19 Tests Are Faulty
“For the past months, government agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have been relying on Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) testing results to track the spread of the pandemic.”
“But in recent months, both agencies have begun to concede that the testing methods that they’re using may not be as accurate as they would want them to be. They acknowledge that an increasing number of so-called positive test results are actually false positives.”
https://humansarefree.com/2020/12/fda-cdc-finally-admit-that-covid-19-tests-are-faulty.html
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of the “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not to Use it to Detect a Virus
The ‘Corona Test’, aka RT-PCR test, is not a test. It is a research tool that has been manipulated by those with an agenda.
https://protectingtheconstitution.home.blog/2021/01/18/the-corona-simulation-machine-why-the-inventor-of-the-corona-test-would-have-warned-us-not-to-use-it-to-detect-a-virus/
COVID Diagnosis with PCR | Misinterpreting results | Cycle threshold explained
“PCR testing to diagnose COVID may be resulting in wrong diagnoses, unnecessary scares about reinfection, and wasted resources. This video explains why RT-PCR tests, which are the gold standard for diagnostic testing, may be hindering our fight against COVID-19; how, after seven months, we still aren’t doing testing right; and what experts believe needs to change. Most importantly, we explore the role of the cycle threshold in all of this. Check out what a “Ct” is and why experts are calling for greater reporting of the Ct in results and changes to its threshold in laboratory protocols.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1Z8cSXI-Q
The Problem of Trying to Determine SARS-CoV-2 infections using PCR Tests
An interview with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a top German physician, pulmonary specialist, and epidemiologist. He was an early and outspoken opponent of the draconian measures taken against the Wuhan Coronavirus, which has earned him the opprobrium of a number of people on the Left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsF9Ac3_Kuc
Live PCR test in Parliament: Coca Cola tests COVID-19 positive
Austrian FPÖ Member of Parliament Michael Schnedlitz administered a COVID-19 PCR test to the beverage Coca Cola in the plenum before his colleagues. The popular drink tested positive for the COVID-19 coronavirus.
He said he was performing the test live before parliament: “so you can see how worthless and misguided these mass tests are.”
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/292952
COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless… Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose
“Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”
But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.”
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
We Are Being Lied To! Here Is How…
President Trump’s doctor, said that Trump’s diagnosis was confirmed using the PCR test. Just like virtually every other ‘confirmed case’ we hear reported.
But was PCR really developed with the intention of diagnosing infectious diseases? Is PCR capable of diagnosing infectious diseases? How could a test developed almost 40 years ago be used to diagnose a brand new disease found less than one year ago?
In this report, we examine this questions in addition to reviewing video clips of multiple doctors weighing in on the subject including the biochemist Kary Mullis who invented PCR and won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for doing so has to say.
Why is understanding the test so important?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljxah4NrYKU&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR1i5Ikz82zm9K9qmPmJOq3aKtHd4lkHAABK2oJdfiTfhcNloalWEBEFR90
Covid is the con covering NANO-AI converting your cells
“I have a Ph.D. in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under an SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which the CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples.
We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema, etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with.
We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated, and purified sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab worldwide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found were small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.
So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud.”
12/10/20 Rob Oswald Ph.D.
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/dontyoudare-did-virologist-immunologist-robert-osward-write-there-is-no-covid-19/?unapproved=2013&moderation-hash=192389499cc6af4d7284d46aa12cac89#comment-2013
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
“In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”
“Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Coronavirus tests are extremely sensitive. (That could be a problem, experts say.)
“Some of the nation’s leading public health experts say that the most commonly used type of coronavirus test in America could be generating positive results for large numbers of people who are carrying low levels of the virus and therefore may not be contagious, Apoorva Mandavilli reports for the New York Times.”
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/09/01/covid-tests
COVID-19 Testing Too Sensitive, Experts Say
“Health experts say polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, testing is too sensitive and needs to be altered to rule out people who have insignificant amounts of COVID-19 because they’re likely not contagious, the Daily Mail reported Sunday.”
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/pcr-testing-contagious-new-york/2020/08/30/id/984566/
Positive COVID-19 Test Doesn’t Mean You’re Contagious: CDC
“On Aug. 14 the Centers for Disease Control once again issued new information. This time, they’ve updated their isolation guidance. They say that research shows that people can test positive for up to three months after being infected with coronavirus, but most people are only contagious for about 10 days of their infections.”
https://heavy.com/news/2020/08/positive-covid-19-test-doesnt-mean-contagious/
Here’s How The RT-PCR Test To Detect Covid-19 Works
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSitbkM8lA
Lawsuit to Prove PCR Test Incapable of Diagnosing Covid-19 as Infectious Disease
Lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, expert in international law, medical law, corruption cases and a member of the German Corona Investigation Committee outlines “the corona fraud scandal” through the manipulation of the RT-PCR tests to give false positives. Reiner has already won big lawsuits against big corporations including Deutsche Banks, and his committee are now taking some of the big players behind this, to court, in a huge international lawsuit. This is effectively, as Reiner explains, a crime against humanity, and arguably the greatest coups attempted in human history.
John Cooper interviews consumer protection trial lawyer Reiner Fuellmich to talk about the Coronavirus and his work on the German Corona investigation committee.
https://rumble.com/vbfget-reiner-fuellmich-lawsuit-to-prove-pcr-is-fake-cv19-diagnosis.html
The PCR Pandemic is Medical Terrorism and Great Reset
Interview with Kary Mullis and others on the misuse of the PCR ‘test’.
https://rumble.com/vb94v5-the-pcr-pandemic-is-medical-terrorism-and-great-reset.html
Standard Covid-19 tests may not give actual scale of infection in patients
“Some of the nation’s leading public health experts are raising a new concern in the endless debate over coronavirus testing in the United States: The standard tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus.
Most of these people are not likely to be contagious, and identifying them may contribute to bottlenecks that prevent those who are contagious from being found in time.”
https://www.deccanherald.com/international/world-news-politics/standard-covid-19-tests-may-not-give-actual-scale-of-infection-in-patients-879856.html
Dead virus fragments are causing COVID-19 reinfection false positives
“Now, a team of South Korean researchers has revealed that reports of recovered coronavirus patients testing positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection a second time round are due to testing errors and not actually reinfection.”
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200504/Dead-virus-fragments-are-causing-COVID-19-reinfection-false-positives.aspx
‘Dead’ coronavirus particles may cause recovered patients to test positive
“South Korean health officials said recovered coronavirus patients who later tested positive again only did so because “dead” virus particles remained in their bodies — not because they became re-infected.”
https://nypost.com/2020/04/30/dead-coronavirus-particles-may-cause-positive-test-results/
The Importance of Cycle Threshold Values in the Evaluation of Patients with Persistent Positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2: Case Study and Brief Review
“Ct values appear to play an important role when the test-based discontinuation of isolation of the patient is considered. It appears that infectivity is low in patients with Ct values greater than 24. In the case study presented in this manuscript, the healthcare worker was asymptomatic with a Ct value of 38 at day 29 after the initial positive RT-PCR. It was considered that the positive RT-PCR likely reflected the presence of residual viral genomic RNA, without the presence of live viruses. The healthcare worker was deemed non-infectious and she was allowed to return to work. Our current
approach is to allow to return to work healthcare workers with persistently positive RT-PCR if the Ct values are greater than 35.”
https://ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1160&context=jri
https://ir.library.louisville.edu/jri/vol4/iss1/54/
Covid tests could be picking up DEAD virus cells from weeks’ old infections and ‘false positives’ could be exaggerating scale of pandemic, claims study
“Despite coronavirus only being infectious for around a week, the tests used to diagnose the disease could still show a positive reading for weeks after the end of a patient’s illness.
Experts don’t know how to produce a reliable test without potentially missing cases but Professor Carl Heneghan, one of the study’s author’s, suggested a cut off point so low amounts of virus do not give a positive result.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8700649/Covid-tests-picking-DEAD-virus-cells-weeks-old-infections-says-study.html
Coronavirus: Tests ‘could be picking up dead virus’
Most people are infectious only for about a week, but could test positive weeks afterwards. Researchers say this could be leading to an over-estimate of the current scale of the pandemic.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54000629
Experts: US COVID-19 positivity rate high due to ‘too sensitive’ tests
“Up to 90 percent of people tested for COVID-19 in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada in July carried barely any traces of the virus and it could be because today’s tests are ‘too sensitive’, experts say.
Health experts say PCR testing – the most widely used diagnostic test for COVID-19 in the US – are too sensitive and need to be adjusted to rule out people who have insignificant amounts of the virus in their systems because they’re likely not contagious.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/experts-us-covid-19-positivity-rate-high-due-to-too-sensitive-tests/ar-BB18wE8B
Coronavirus tests too sensitive, Oxford University academic warns
“Fragments of the virus can remain in the body for many weeks afterwards, with some studies showing intermittent shedding up to 70 days later…”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/05/coronavirus-tests-sensitive-oxford-university-academic-warns/
What Is A Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value In qPCR
In this article, I will explain what is meant by a Ct value in quantification (real-time) PCR (qPCR). I will also discuss the difference between Ct and Cq values.
https://toptipbio.com/ct-value-qpcr/
What Is a Cq (Ct) Value?
“If you are performing quantitative PCR (qPCR) then it’s crucial you understand what a Ct value is. We’ll take you through its critical role in qPCR, its varying names, how it’s calculated and what it means when it all seems to go a bit wrong.”
https://bitesizebio.com/24581/what-is-a-ct-value/
Covid test should track viral load too, says new ICMR study
“RT-PCR tests for Covid use fluorescent signals to detect nucleic acids. Ct value is the number of cycles required in the machine for the fluorescent signaling to cross the base level of the machine. A low value, therefore, means a high viral load and vice versa.”
“…ICMR is seeing Ct values between 23 to 40 for Covid testing. Below 35 is positive, above 35 negative, and 35 would require a repeat testing.”
“…research trends outside India show a correlation between viral load and severity of illness. One example of this early research is a Lancet paper in March from China that found severe patients have viral loads that were sixty times as much as mild forms of the virus.”
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/coronavirus-test-icmr-viral-load-6439840/
To Interpret the SARS-CoV-2 Test, Consider the Cycle Threshold Value
“In summary, prolonged positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR results raise questions about the sufficiency and sustainability of current isolation guidelines. We suggest that the Ct value from positive test results, when interpreted in context, can help to refine clinical decision making.”
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/71/16/2252/5841456
How long does the coronavirus last inside the body?
“It’s possible that long-term patients are struggling because some of the coronavirus sticks around in their tissues. Researchers are now figuring out how long the germ stays alive inside the body, a situation known as viral persistence. That may be different from the length of time that someone who had COVID-19 can shed viral fragments, which can sometimes cause false positives on diagnostic tests.”
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/06/how-long-does-coronavirus-last-inside-the-body-cvd/
Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany. False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test
“But even more damning for Drosten is the fact that he mentioned nowhere of a test being positive or negative, or indeed what defines a positive or negative result! The Borger report notes, “These types of virological diagnostic tests must be based on a SOP (Standard Operational Protocol), including a validated and fixed number of PCR cycles (Ct value) after which a sample is deemed positive or negative. The maximum reasonably reliable Ct value is 30 cycles. Above a Ct of 35 cycles, rapidly increasing numbers of false positives must be expected… scientific studies show that only non-infectious (dead) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35.” (emphasis added).
The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles and, reportedly, presently the German health officials do as well. Little wonder that as the number of tests is ramped up in the onset of winter flu season, PCR “positives” in Germany and elsewhere explode. As the critical authors point out, were the health authorities to specify 35 cycles maximum, the number of corona positive would be only less than 3% the present number! They note, “an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless (a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30). All this should be communicated very clearly. “
https://www.globalresearch.ca/coronavirus-scandal-breaking-merkel-germany/5731891
How the COVID scam was implemented… Corman-Drosten Review Report
“The Corman-Drosten Paper was a ‘study’ that declared the RT-PCR test could accurately diagnose Covid. The paper was submitted to the “Eurosurveillance”, a European medical journal on Jan. 21, 2020, published on Jan. 23, 2020 and immediately accepted by the WHO as the gold standard for diagnosing Covid.
On Jan. 21, 2020, there had only been six deaths worldwide. The virus had not been isolated and the RT-PCR was “based on in silico (THEORETICAL) sequences”. As of July 2020, the CDC admitted the virus had never been isolated (identified), though vaccine trials were already ongoing.
The paper NEVER went through the peer-review process, NEVER evaluated by other doctors or scientists for accuracy before being published.
Two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten Paper are on the editorial board of Eurosurveillance…
The ‘Review’ link on this page will take you to the review of the Corman-Drosten Paper by top doctors and scientists, listing the fatal flaws in the paper.
The ‘Retraction’ link will take you to the request by top doctors and scientists for the Corman-Drosten Paper to be retracted.
https://cormandrostenreview.com/
Professor Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi Challenges the Coronavirus Crisis. (ENGLISH AUDIO)
German researcher and specialist in microbiology, having studied at the universities of Bonn, Giesen, Mainz, and Copenhagen, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is the author of “Coronavirus: false alarm?” In this video he discusses several topics, including the fact no one can prove asymptomatic person can spread the Covid and the PCR “test” has never been proven to be able to infect cells in culture.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Rwb5QzJY2-s/
“PCR tests are a lab pandemic.” – Prof Sucharit Bhakdi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbM4SH8rtyQ
Bombshell Report: 90% of Positive COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GmQVm-kLoM
Protecting the Constitution 
Leave a reply to All the Covid Fauci is hiding… – Protecting the Constitution Cancel reply