On August 26, Dr. Eli Capilouto, President of the University of Kentucky, sent an email to all the faculty, staff and students. The stated purpose of the email was to inform all those who remain unvaccinated for Covid-19 will be required to take the Covid-19 RT-PCR tests weekly, beginning on September 1, 2021.
In reality, this is a tactic of coercion for the unvaccinated. The fact is, the vaccinated can catch and spread Covid-19, just like the unvaccinated. If Dr. Capilouto were truly concerned about the Delta variant, he would require everyone on the campus of the University of Kentucky to be tested… not just the unvaccinated.
According to Dr. Capilouto, failure to comply will result in penalties.
Not only does this violate the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which is U.S. federal law, but the plain fact is, the RT-PCR tests have been found to have up to a 97% false positive. In December 2020, the CDC testing guidelines declared the tests cannot definitively diagnose Covid-19 and cannot rule out other causes for a positive result. In addition, in July 2021, the CDC announced the RT-PCR tests will be phased out by the end of the year and replaced with a test that can differentiate between the flu and Covid-19.
The RT-PCR tests, masks and the Covid-19 masks were all authorized as experimental medical products by the FDA. Per the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and the EUA, everyone must be informed of the risks and benefits of the experimental products and have the right of refusal. It is illegal to force or coerce anyone to use the products against their will. Retribution, penalties for refusing are illegal.
In reality, this coercion is all about the Covid-19 vaccines. Most are still authorized under the EUA. Even the claim the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine remains under the EUA. The FDA approval was for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine. Though the FDA claims the two are of the same formulation and interchangeable, they do have different legal statuses, or which most people are unaware.
You are being forced to take part in the 3rd stage of the vaccine trials – a 2-year process that is scheduled to end December 2022. At this point, the resulting data has not been reviewed or made public.
The following is the email from Dr. Capilouto to the faculty, staff and students of the University of Kentucky. Below that is the response my husband sent to Dr. Capilouto, in which he states he will not take the tests, will not take the Covid-19 vaccines and will not wear the masks.
Governments, corporations, universities and schools are using people’s ignorance of these facts, along with scare tactics and false information to force the entire nation, down to six months of age to take the vaccines and the never ending boosters. Don’t let them force you. Educate yourself, make your own decision and stand up for your rights.
The penalties were revealed on September 16, 2021. Reprimand letters will be placed in employee files after two weeks of refusing to be tested / vaccinated. After three weeks, the employee will not be eligible for the pay raise in January 2022. After four weeks of refusal, the employees will be put on unpaid leave.
My husband is a retired USAF Veteran and has worked for the University of Kentucky for 20 years. We had no idea he was going to work for a communistic, tyrannical learning institution after serving for 20 years defending the U.S. and Constitution. I wonder how many at UK served in the Middle East… especially when the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia were blown up and American military were killed.
Dr. Capilouto’s Email:
From: University of Kentucky President Eli Capilouto <uk_president@lifecycle.uky.edu>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 2:34 PM
To: Baker, Tim <tim.baker@uky.edu>
Subject: Mandatory Testing for Everyone Who is Unvaccinated
Campus Community,
I am writing to you a day early with my weekly update because we are moving quickly to continue bolstering our efforts to keep our community safe and healthy. We are evaluating our policies and plans every day to ensure we are putting our community first in everything that we do. To that end, a number of steps are being taken as a next phase of our overall plan:
Mandatory weekly testing for everyone who is unvaccinated
Beginning September 1, COVID-19 testing for everyone (faculty, staff and students) on our campus who is unvaccinated will be mandatory.
Unvaccinated students already are testing. This requirement now extends to unvaccinated faculty and staff as well. Testing will be required on a weekly basis. If and when someone is fully vaccinated, they will no longer be required to test.
I have made this decision in consultation with our elected faculty, staff and student representatives, based on their very thoughtful recommendations as we continue to navigate in response to emerging data and evidence related to the pandemic. Our UK START team of scientists and health professionals met this week and also strongly recommends this step, along with increased communication about the efficacy and safety of vaccines. You may have seen in the news this week that the Pfizer vaccine gained full FDA approval — a move that I hope boosts confidence even further in vaccines.
I am deeply appreciative of the thoughtful input from campus leaders in discussing this step. We continue to actively consider whether additional measures — such as mandating vaccines across campus for all students, faculty and staff — will be required. Such a move may be necessary, but it is complicated and must be done thoughtfully as it raises further questions around who is exempted and how is the policy enforced equitably among those impacted, among other things.
We share the same goal: to protect our community and support the best possible living, learning and working environment possible.
I believe that means having our students back on campus, in classes, working with world-class faculty and staff.
The best way to ensure we continue to provide that environment is to vaccinate as many people as possible, as quickly as possible. Vaccines are safe. They are effective. And they provide strong protection against serious illness or hospitalization from the virus.
As a result, we plan to test you until you take this important health measure. Vaccination protects you and others.
Here are the highlights of our testing plan for any unvaccinated faculty, staff or student: Employees should begin signing up for their mandatory testing appointments on August 30. Testing will begin September 1. Two employee-only testing sites will be opened on campus. We will provide details on those sites shortly. Employees can be tested during work hours. Workers who are paid hourly will not have to take leave time to test. Students will continue testing in the Blue Box Theatre at the Gatton Student Center. Employees can continue testing at this location as well. Anyone can continue to test as well at the community site on College Way near Kentucky Proud Park. We are optimistic that our community will comply with this measure because it’s the right thing to do. You care about the health, safety and well-being of your community. However, there will be penalties for non-compliance. Those measures must be equitable, regardless of whether someone is a faculty, student or staff member. As such, we will institute disciplinary actions for non-compliance. We will communicate about those measures soon as we continue to confer with our elected faculty, student and staff representatives. As a reminder, masks continue to be required indoors regardless of vaccination. Compliance with this policy is essential as masks are an important mitigation strategy for our campus. Vaccinations
As part of our goal to reach an 80 percent campus vaccination rate, we are initiating an incentive program for faculty and staff. As with our student program, you will have to be vaccinated to be eligible to win.
Prizes will include an extra week of vacation; free parking and meal plans; and credit at the UK Bookstore, among others. We will provide registration information and details about the employee incentive plan next week.
Students can continue to register for their incentive program here. As of earlier this week, more than 3,000 students had registered for incentives.
Our Progress
Our campus community is making tremendous progress on vaccination levels.
As of Tuesday, 74 percent of our current campus community was fully vaccinated or in the process of being fully vaccinated. That’s up 5 percentage points since late July.
The breakdown is as follows: 82 percent of faculty 75 percent of staff And a little more than 70 percent of returning students. We will have new students factored into our calculations in early September, but our early indications are that their numbers are rapidly increasing as well. The bottom line: We are making tangible progress toward our initial goal of 80 percent of our community vaccinated. We have, as always, more work to do. But our community is once again meeting the moment.
Other Efforts
There’s no question that our community — and those we serve — are being challenged by a resurgence of the virus, with the Delta variant. But there’s also no question that we are doing what is necessary to keep our community safe.
With the expansion of mandatory testing, we will — at least temporarily — be adding staffing in UK Health Corps, the modern public health infrastructure we established last academic year, to help with even more robust contact tracing and support. We also will be adding COVID-19 monitors who will help us ensure compliance across campus with our policies and processes.
More testing will mean detection of more cases of the virus, at least in the short term. That will require more support for our community.
Remember, though, that we have been here before. We came together and supported one another with equipment and supplies, healing and hope. That made a difference. We were challenged, but never failed to put our community first. We always do what we can — and what we must — to advance Kentucky. I know we will once again. Thank you for being part of this community.
Eli Capilouto
An Equal Opportunity University
This email was sent by: University of Kentucky
410 Administration Drive, Lexington, KY, 40506
Refusal Letter:
August 30, 2021
Dr. Eli Capilouto
President of University of Kentucky
101 Main Building
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40506-0032
Dear Dr. Capilouto,
This notice is in response to your email of August 26, 2021, in which you discuss mandatory weekly testing for everyone who is unvaccinated. My findings raise significant concerns, both medically and legally, of the current testing policy in place. Testing is ineffective for the purpose claimed by the mandate, potentially harmful, and only authorized for use by an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The EUA is used for experimental products.
In addition, significant concerns, again legally and medically, for the University of Kentucky’s mask mandates for most of the last 12 months and the consideration to mandate vaccines for all students, faculty and staff are included in this notice. Like the RT-PCR for testing, masks and Covid-19 vaccines were authorized per the EUA, which gives everyone the right of refusal.
First and foremost, the Nuremberg Code was established August 19, 1947, and states:
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.”1
The Declaration of Helsinki was established June 1964 and states:
“Participation by individuals capable of giving informed consent as subjects in medical research must be voluntary. Although it may be appropriate to consult family members or community leaders, no individual capable of giving informed consent may be enrolled in a research study unless he or she freely agrees.
In medical research involving human subjects capable of giving informed consent, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, sources of funding, any possible conflicts of interest, institutional affiliations of the researcher, the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study and the discomfort it may entail, post-study provisions and any other relevant aspects of the study. The potential subject must be informed of the right to refuse to participate in the study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time without reprisal. Special attention should be given to the specific information needs of individual potential subjects as well as to the methods used to deliver the information.” 2
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) :
21 USC 360bbb-3: Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (Section e:1:A:ii)
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed-
- that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
- of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
- of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.3
As each of these clearly state, every individual has the right to refuse the use of experimental products. Federal law preempts state law. 4
__________________
1 https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/medical-magazines/nuremberg-code-establishes-principle-informed-consent
2 https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
3 https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title:21%20section:360bbb-3%20edition:prelim%29
4 https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities#preemption
Per the CDC, RT-PCR tests are incapable of definitively diagnosing Covid-19
In July of 2020 and again in December of 2020, the CDC admitted the SARS-CoV-2 virus had not been isolated at the time the RT-PCR test was developed, making it impossible for the test to confirm a Covid-19 infection diagnosis.
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test [RT-PCR] was developed…” 1
December 2020, the CDC admitted they cannot diagnose Covid-19 with the RT-PCR tests.
•Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
•The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.
•The performance of this test has not been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-nCoV.
•This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. 2
Professor Doctor Christian Drosten of Germany is credited with creating the ‘gold standard’ of the RT-PCR tests used to diagnose Covid-19, and he is now facing multiple lawsuits.
Prior to January 20, 2020, China repeatedly declared SARS-CoV2 (Covid-19) was not contagious. On January 20, 2020, they finally admitted it is contagious. On January 21, 2020, the Corman-Drosten Paper, a ‘study’ that declared the RT-PCR test could accurately diagnose Covid, was submitted to the Eurosurveillance, a European medical journal. The paper never went through a peer-review process, and two of the co-authors of the paper are on the board of Eurosurveillance. In addition, Corman of the Corman-Drosten Paper works for the company that manufactures the PCR tests.
On January 23, 2020, just two days later, the WHO (World Health Organization) accepted it as the ‘gold standard’ for diagnosing Covid.
The International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) reviewed the Corman-Drosten Paper and in November 2020 submitted the review to Eurosurveillance, listing numerous serious flaws, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19. These flaws led to a possible 97% chance of a false positives and the flaws were used by policymakers to determine closures, lock downs of every aspect, including education, forced testing and to push unnecessary vaccines. The ICSLS also submitted a letter requesting the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted. 3
It was shortly after the November 2020 submission of the Corman-Drosten Review that the CDC admitted the RT-PCR cannot definitively diagnosis Covid-19 and the WHO admitted there were problems with the test in December 2020. Various lawsuits against Christian Drosten, the WHO and the CDC are moving forward. 4
July 2021, the CDC announced they would be phasing out the RT-PCR test by the end of 2021 and replacing it with a test that can differentiate between the flu and Covid-19.
“”CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses,” the agency said Wednesday.” 5
Decisions based on RT-PCR tests with a false positivity rate of 97% have done a great deal of damage to lives and the country. Individuals who tested positive were forced to self-isolate for 10 – 15 days, often along with family members. This severely impacted income, which led to further problems of paying rent, mortgages, buying food and any other required expenses.
Lock downs across the nation for a year or more forced companies to shutdown permanently – between 26.5% and 44.3% in all the states across the nation, with an overall average of 34.7% as of August 27, 2021. That is more than 1/3rd of the small businesses permanently shut down due to decisions based on a test with up to 97% false positives – destroying millions of jobs. Kentucky is higher than the national average at 35.5%. 6
Children have also been severely impacted by decisions based on fraudulent testing data, with schools across the nation being shut down and children isolated from their friends and denied normal activities. Mental health visits to the ER increased by 31% in 2020 between March and October as compared to 2019 for the same time period. Young people between 11 to 21 were found to have significantly higher rates of suicide ideation during visits to the ER in the first half of 2020 versus 2019, though luckily the number of successful suicides did not escalate. The endless bombardment by news outlets of overly inflated “positive case” numbers implying something equivalent to the Black Plague had hit the world and the isolation were overwhelming… again, based on an up to 97% false positivity rate. 7
The stress of the nation was compounded by inflated Covid-19 death numbers. In March 2020, the CDC changed the guidelines for recording Covid-19 deaths exclusively without peer-review or OMB oversight. Doctors were pressured to note any death as a “Covid-19” death, even without a positive test. The end result was a nation spiraling down in massive fear. Using the pre-March 2020 guidelines, it was found the actual number of Covid-19 deaths were only 6% of reported numbers. 8
As of August 27, 2021, the reported Covid-19 deaths is 652,086 since January 2020. Using the pre-March 2020 guidelines for determining cause of death, the real number of Covid-19 deaths is 39,125. 9
Your decision to test only unvaccinated individuals is an example of coercion to pressure people into taking the Covid-19 vaccines. The testing process of inserting swabs deeply into the nostrils are intimidating and often create discomfort and pain.
In May 2021, the CDC stopped counting the number of break-through Covid-19 cases in the vaccinated when the count reached 10,000. This has made it impossible to calculate the true rate of infection with the Delta variant in the vaccinated.
According to a Bloomberg analysis, more than 111,000 break-through cases have been found in 35 states between May and the end of July 2021. Other states no longer track mild break-through cases per the CDC instructions, making it impossible to predict which areas may have a large outbreak of the Delta variant. The CDC claims they are still counting break-through cases of those who were hospitalized or died, but their results do not match the data from countries that continue to track the outcomes for both the vaccinated and unvaccinated. 10
Your determination to not test the vaccinated, a group that carries as heavy a viral load as the unvaccinated, seems to imply your testing of the unvaccinated is geared more towards coercion of the unvaccinated to take the vaccines, than it does in any serious efforts to track the number of the Delta-variant cases on the University of Kentucky’s campus. 11 In addition, with the vast number of false positives resulting from the RT-PCR tests, any data you gather will have little to no value.
The CDC appears to have a strong conflict-of-interest in regard to their responsibility to monitor and make health decisions in the best interest of the nation. The CDC Foundation was given at least $28 million in 2014 by Big Pharma and others. In 2013, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gave the CDC Foundation $13.5 million. In addition, the CDC owns approximately 57 patents, 20 of which are vaccine patents and the CDC is listed in the Dun and Bradstreet business directory. It appears the ‘decisions’ made by the CDC may be based more on promoting their products and those of their donors.
Further, your threat of penalties for non-compliance is a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki and the Emergency Use Authorization for experimental products. The RT-PCR tests were authorized under the Emergency Use Authorization and cannot be mandated. In addition, the EUA requires I be fully informed of all benefits and risks and gives me the right of refusal without coercion.
1 https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download – page 42
2 https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download – page 40
3 https://cormandrostenreview.com/
4 https://rumble.com/vbfget-reiner-fuellmich-lawsuit-to-prove-pcr-is-fake-cv19-diagnosis.html;
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17X4GmMXn_m-vDwqEy9vMhbNqzodAEW3b/view
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/297626
http://cognitive-liberty.online/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-test-as-unreliable/
5https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
6 https://blog.cheapism.com/small-businesses-covid/
https://www.aier.org/article/the-catastrophic-impact-of-covid-forced-societal-lockdowns/
7 https://www.propublica.org/article/the-lost-year-what-the-pandemic-cost-teenagers
https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2021/03/09/propublica-children-paid-highest-price-covid-19-lockdowns-lives-n380527
8 https://www.ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/C19dataCollection-C+FL-HistPerspec.pdf
9 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
10 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-30/cdc-scaled-back-hunt-for-breakthrough-cases-just-as-the-delta-variant-grew
11 https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/files/coronavirus/covid-19-infection-survey/finalfinalcombinedve20210816.pdf
Covid-19 vaccines are experimental, ineffective and dangerous.
As of December 31, 2020, there were 19,663,976 reported positive cases of Covid-19. 1 While the data coming from the CDC is highly suspect regarding positive cases and resulting deaths, it is the only data available. That being said, even this data reveals the mandate to vaccinate every single person in the nation down to six months of age is unjustified, including those who have natural immunity from the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The following table calculates the death rate by age group for the period of January 2020 – December 31, 2020. 2 Though Covid-19 vaccines were introduced in the nation in mid-December, they were primarily given to those in the older age groups and the Delta variant did not hit the U.S. until March 2021.
| Table 1 | |||
| Age Group | Number of Deaths | Percentage of Deaths | Survival Percentage Rate |
| 0 – 17 years | 198 | 0.0010% | 99.9990% |
| 18 – 29 years | 1,481 | 0.0075% | 99.9925% |
| 30 – 39 years | 4,287 | 0.0218% | 99.9782% |
| 40 – 49 years | 11,318 | 0.0576% | 99.9424% |
| 50 – 64 years | 56,740 | 0.2885% | 99.7115% |
| 65 – 74 years | 82,249 | 0.4183% | 99.5817% |
| 75 – 84 years | 106,201 | 0.5401% | 99.4599% |
| 85 + years | 122,775 | 0.6244% | 99.3756% |
The criteria used for this data was the “United States”, appropriate age group, “all sexes” and death year = 2020.
This clearly shows the overall death rate was very low prior to the Covid-19 vaccines being made available to the general public, even with early and effective treatment being banned. Early in the pandemic, recommendations were made by doctors and researchers to treat the virus with hydroxychloroquine and zinc, perhaps with the addition of azithromycin. However, questionable studies were initiated and designed to discredit hydroxychloroquine by either withholding the treatment until very late in the illness with small doses or giving toxic levels to patients.
The much-touted VA study was paid for by the NIH and University of Virginia and was conducted as a retrospective analysis by three ophthalmologists. The ophthalmologists were conflicted with ties to the University of Virginia, Gilead Sciences (developer of the strongly promoted Remdesivir) and one owned a coronavirus patent. The patients selected for the hydroxychloroquine portion of the study did not receive HCQ until they were on ventilators, the disease well advanced, organs already shutting down and the doses they received were very small. HCQ is most effective when treatment is started as early as possible, which is true for any medical treatment.3
The Recovery study conducted by Oxford prescribed participants 2,400 mg of hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hours. France mandates hospitalization if 1,800 mg are ingested and England maintains 490 mg for a 165-pound adult. 4
Hydroxychloroquine has been used by millions of people for 65 years. Individuals with lupus and rheumatoid arthritis take it daily for decades with no heart problems. Individuals take it weekly for decades to prevent malaria with no heart problems. Women with autoimmune diseases are given it during pregnancy to protect the heart of the unborn child from the mother’s immune system attacking it. Hydroxychloroquine is used in the treatment of some types of cancer. 5
Over 300 studies prove hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin substantially reduce death from Covid-19 when started within 48 hours of symptoms starting. Using both prophylactically has also shown the ability to reduce contraction / symptoms of Covid-19. Links to additional studies of very beneficial treatments, such as zinc, D3 and others is available from the c19study.com website. 6
The CDC recommends high-risk individuals see a doctor and start antivirals within 48 hours of the initiation of flu symptoms. 7
However, the CDC guidelines for Covid-19 recommends taking aspirin and remaining at home until an emergency occurs, such as trouble breathing. By that stage, SARS-CoV-2 has overwhelmed the body, making it much more difficult to treat. Delaying treatment until the illness escalates to a life-threatening stage is medical malpractice and cannot be tolerated – even if the physician or hospital is simply following instructions from the CDC, FDA, NIH, etc.
As Table 1 above shows, per the CDC’s own data, death from Covid-19 is no higher than the death rate from the annual flu, for which billions of people around the world (including millions in the U.S.) never get a vaccination. Though several questionable studies attempted to denigrate hydroxychloroquine, over 200 studies show it is safe and effective, especially when prescribed early.
Financial interests influenced the decision to ban hydroxychloroquine and push Remdesivir. Multiple members on the NIH’s Covid Advisory Group had financial ties to Gilead Sciences (developer of Remdesivir). 9 Studies reveal hydroxychloroquine provides 64% improvement versus Remdesivir with only 22% effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 10
Claims the Covid-19 vaccines are 94% and 95% effective are extremely misleading. These percentages were determined using ‘relative’ effectiveness, which is a deceptive marketing ploy. It presents a portion of resulting data without context.
For example, flea medication helps 2 out of 100 dogs (2%). The next year, the medication improves and now helps 3 out of 100 dogs (3%). The manufacturer advertises his flea medication is 50% more effective because 3 – 2 = 1, and the 1 is 1/2 or 50% of the initial value, 2.
However, when you use the absolute values of the original (2%) and improvement (3%) values, you see the actual improvement is only 1%… not nearly as impressive as citing the relative improvement value. Citing only the relative difference without providing the total context is useless and misleading information, and could be considered fraudulent.
The following data is from the clinical data trials presented to the FDA for vaccine approval. The effectiveness claims cited by these vaccine makers were manipulated by ignoring the number of participants in the trials.
Moderna – Covid Cases – claims 95% effectiveness
11 of 13,934 vaccinated participants caught Covid-19 = 0.08%
185 of 13,883 unvaccinated participants caught Covid-19 = 1.33%
Actual effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine: 1.33% – 0.08% = 1.25%
Pfizer- Covid Cases – claims 94% effectiveness
8 of 17,411 vaccinated participants caught Covid-19 = 0.05%
162 of 17,511 unvaccinated participants caught Covid-19 = 0.93%
Actual effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine: 0.93% – 0.05 = 0.88%
Johnson & Johnson – Covid Cases – claims 66% effectiveness (Janssen is the parent company)
114 of 21,424 vaccinated participants caught Covid-19 = 0.53%
326 of 21,199 unvaccinated participants caught Covid-19 = 1.54%
Actual effectiveness of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine: 1.54% – 0.53 = 1.01% 11
Contrary to news reports, the FDA did not approve the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. On August 23, 2021, the FDA sent two letters to Pfizer. The first granted Pfizer an extension of the EUA for its Covid-19 vaccines. 12 The second was an FDA approval for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, which may or may not be available in the U.S. to the general public until 2023.13
Per the FDA Q & A, the two vaccines are identical:
“The FDA-approved Pfizer-BioNTech product Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine under EUA have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns.” 14
While the FDA states the two have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably, they each have a different legal status. EUA products are experimental and it is illegal to penalize or use coercion to force them on anyone. By the same token, telling people they are using an FDA-approved product that in reality is the EUA product is illegal. 15
The spike protein on the SARS-CoV-2 virus is on the outside of the virus and is used to attach itself to the human cell. Upon entering the cell, the virus uses the cell’s mechanisms to replicate itself. The Covid-19 vaccines carry instructions to human cells on how to make the spike protein. The body is then supposed to recognize it as a foreign invader and create antibodies to the spike protein. When the SARS-CoV-2 virus enters the body, the immune system is supposed to recognize the spike proteins and immediately attack the virus. 16
Mutations are a mechanism viruses have always used to ensure their survival. When the spike protein on the SARS-CoV-2 virus mutates, the body’s immune system no longer recognizes it and must start the whole process all over again of creating antibodies to fight it. At this point, the vaccines are completely useless as it targets only one part of the virus – the spike protein. Creating new antibodies to the virus with the mutated spike protein takes time and allows the virus to spread throughout the body. For those with weak immune systems, not prepped with D3, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, this can result in serious illness or hospitalization. Additionally, denying early treatment increases the likelihood of death. 17
Antibodies developed from natural recovery from any disease, however, has the benefit of being able to recognize all parts of the virus. The mutation of one or two parts does not affect the body’s immune system’s ability to recognize the disease and immediately fight it off. 18
As of May 2021, 9654 mutations of the spike protein were observed, making the Covid-19 vaccines useless. The original Covid-19 has burned itself out and we are left only with thousands and thousands of mutations. Forcing people to take the original Covid-19 vaccine versions, along with a thousand booster shots will have absolutely no effect as the SARS-CoV-2 mutations continue to circle the globe. 19
We have been told since the beginning of the pandemic vaccines were needed if we were to ever return to normal. We were told the vaccines would prevent catching and transmitting Covid-19 and the variants, and for that reason, everyone in the world must be vaccinated, even the naturally recovered.
The original Covid-19 virus has pretty much run its course, and now almost 99% of the cases in the U.S. are of the Delta variant. 20 Cases are spiking across the nation, despite over half of the country having been vaccinated since December 2020. On August 8, 2021, the CDC Director accidentally revealed the truth… not only can the vaccinated catch Covid-19, or at least the mutations, but they can also transmit it to others… both vaccinated and unvaccinated. 21
The Delta variant is more contagious than the original and the vaccinated carry a viral load as high as the unvaccinated. 22 The CDC claims:
However, that is not what the data shows. The CDC’s manipulation of data makes it difficult to determine the reality of the status of vaccinated versus unvaccinated cases in the U.S., and the level of severity and death in both groups. Even though the CDC stopped tracking breakthrough cases in May 2021, Israel, Iceland and England have continued tracking and reporting on Delta cases and deaths in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated.
As of August 5, 2021, over 71% of Iceland has been fully vaccinated, and yet they are experiencing the worst outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak since the pandemic began in January 2020. The Covid-19 vaccines have clearly not reduced the level of infection that can occur with the Delta variant. 24
Israel reported between May 1 and July 12, 2021, 72 (1%) of Delta cases were in the naturally recovered, while 3,000 (40%) were in the vaccinated group. 25 As of August 5, 2021, the medical director of Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, Dr. Kobi Haviv, stated:
“…95% of the severe patients are the vaccinated.”
“…85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people…”
“… the hospital is “opening more and more Covid wards.”
Dr. Haviv concluded “…the effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out.” On July 22, 2021, the Israeli Minister of Health released data showing the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine dropped from 90% to 39%, occurring at the same time the Delta variant hit the country. 26
England has done an exceptional job tracking the data on the vaccinated and unvaccinated and making that information available to the public each month. The data shows the percentage of cases, hospitalizations and deaths for the vaccinated are increasing, while the same for the unvaccinated are decreasing.
The narrative from news outlets and our national health agencies (CDC, FDA, NIH), as well as Dr. Fauci, is that the Covid-19 vaccines reduce severity and deaths from the Delta variant, even with breakthrough cases. However, the data for all 3 months from England shows the vaccinated have a higher percentage of deaths, and the percentage difference is growing each month:
Emergency Use Authorization, under which the vaccines were authorized, is designed for occasions when treatment is not readily available in emergency situations. The Covid-19 disease does not meet the criteria of an emergency, does not require vaccines at all, let alone mandated for everyone 6 months and older.
1. While Covid-19 and its mutations are very contagious, the overall death rate is the same as the annual flu…. about .2%. For children, the death rate is .003%, a statistical rate of 0.0%.
2. SARS-CoV-2 is one of 7 coronaviruses that have existed for decades, 4 of which are colds. SARS 1 and MERS are the other two. Millions of people around the world have had and recovered from the other six coronaviruses and have a significant level of immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
3. From the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, doctors around the world began treating patients very successfully with existing medications, as well as vitamins and minerals. Just as is recommended by the CDC for the annual flu, early treatment is essential for high-risk patients. The vast majority of Covid-19 survivors recovered with little to no symptoms, meaning their immune systems were strong and they had few co-morbidities.
4. Demanding those who have recovered and have natural antibodies to take the vaccines is proof this has nothing to do with the virus, but is more about further enriching Big Pharma and the national health agencies who rely on Big Pharma donations. The data clearly shows antibodies from natural recovery provide a broad spectrum of protection against any and all mutations and are highly effective. Boosters are not needed.
In March 2020, just a couple of weeks after Dr. Fauci stopped declaring Covid-19 was not a threat to the U.S., recommendations of early treatment with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, D3 and C combinations were shown to be quite effective. These recommendations were quickly censored and hydroxychloroquine was denigrated and banned. Other treatments found over the following months have also been proven to be highly effective. The availability of all of these makes the need for Covid-19 vaccines moot.
| Highly Effective Early Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 28 | ||
| Hydroxychloroquine – zinc | Ivermectin | Bamlanivimab |
| Bromhexine | Budesonide | Casirivimab/Imdevimab |
| Curcumin | Fluvoxamine | Iota-carrageenan |
| Melatonin | Molnupiravir | Nigella Sativa |
| Povidone-Iodine | Proxalutamide | Quercetin |
| Sotrovimab | N-acetyl cysteine – zinc | Zinc |
| Vitamin C | D3 | Combinations of all of the above |
Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is mandated by Congress, but many medical professionals are either not aware of that or do not know VAERS exists in the first place. A 3-year study conducted by Harvard revealed less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS. 29
Per VAERS, more people have died from Covid-19 experimental vaccines in 8 months than from all vaccines combined for the previous 30 years. 30
A contract data analysis employee for the CDC has become a whistleblower, revealing Medicare / Medicaid billings show at least 45,000 died within three days of taking the Covid-19 vaccines over a 7-month period. Attorney Thomas Renz announced this is one of 10 – 11 such systems and these deaths may be just the tip of the iceberg. Mr. Renz has filed a lawsuit against the CDC. How many died in four days, five days, a week? 31
October 22, 2020 – two months before the Covid-19 vaccines went public, a presentation was given by the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to review the plans for monitoring Covid-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness.
Slide 16 reveals a working list of possible adverse event outcomes based on the trials and those seen with other vaccines – none of which are listed on the handout sheets given to vaccine recipients. The EUA, Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki all require everyone be fully informed of the risks and benefits, and yet, throughout the country, none of this information has been provided to the public.
These side effects are what have been reported to VAERS, but only myocarditis and pericarditis have been added to the handouts given to vaccine recipients. Up until recently, the inserts in the package for each vial were completely blank, but recently myocarditis and pericarditis were printed on the otherwise blank inserts.
Compare the data on slide 16 with each of the vaccine handouts (next page). Do you find all of the adverse events listed on the handouts?
Moderna – https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/eua-fact-sheet-recipients.pdf
Pfizer – http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14472&format=pdf
The J&J handout does not list the myocarditis or pericarditis, but does list Guillain-Barre Syndrome. It is the only serious adverse event listed on the handout.
J&J – https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/download
Slide 16:
See all the slides used in the VRBPAC presentation and watch an interview in preparation of lawsuits. 32
The vaccines have proven to be deadly and cause more harm than good, especially in the younger generations. It is impossible to know how many have been seriously injured or died. Vast efforts by social media, news outlets, CDC, NIH, FDA and others have hidden these deaths and life-altering injuries.
People are forced to go public in whatever way they can to reveal their injuries and deaths of loved ones.
Dr. Lee Merritt – completed Orthopedic Surgery Residency in the U.S. Navy, served 9 years as a Navy physician and surgeon, and studied bioweapons. She is the only woman to have been appointed as the Louis A. Goldstein Fellow of Spinal Surgery.
“… all through 2020 there were only 20 deaths among all active-duty military personnel related to COVID. However, there are now many reports of tumors and over 80 cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart), which has a 5-year mortality rate of around 66%, following the COVID-19 shots given to the military.
With the vaccine program we’ve ostensibly killed more of our young active-duty people than COVID did.”
Army wife explains how her husband now has major heart problems after taking the Covid-19 vaccines / Whistleblower explains the lengths the military is going to to cover-up deaths from the experimental Covid-19 vaccines.
Children 50 times more likely to die from Covid-19 vaccine than virus itself, claims former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon
Covid Injection Convulsions While Driving
https://rumble.com/vl9omr-covid-injection-convulsions-while-driving.html
Covid Vaccine – Paralysis on Right Side of Body While Driving
https://rumble.com/vl9q9n-covid-vaccine-paralysis-on-right-side-of-body-while-driving.html
Pfizer, Within 2 Days of Getting the Jab, Another Destroyed
https://rumble.com/vl9tjx-pfizer-within-2-days-of-getting-the-jab-destroyed-another.html
Danee Dixon Bravely Speaks Out to Warn Others
https://rumble.com/vl4lzp-danee-dixon-bravely-speaks-out-to-warn-others.html
Covid Vaccines Injury Compilation
https://rumble.com/vl9vf7-covid-vaccines-injury-compilation.html
Injected Even Though Children’s Death Rate is .0003%
https://rumble.com/vl9x8r-injected-even-though-childrens-death-rate-is-.0003.html
Maddie de Garay – Yet One More Child Victim of the Covid Injection
https://rumble.com/vldm7g-maddie-de-garay-yet-one-more-child-victim-of-the-covid-injection.html
Kellai Speaks Out on Moderna Injection Injury
https://rumble.com/vl9ybe-kellai-speaks-out-on-moderna-injection-injury.html
Wayne – 136 Days Since His Covid Injection
https://rumble.com/vlai0j-wayne-136-days-since-his-covid-vaccine.html
What the News is Not Reporting – Injection Injuries
https://rumble.com/vl89zp-what-the-news-is-not-reporting-injection-injuries.html
Doctors Burying Covid Injections Injuries and Deaths
https://rumble.com/vlfdez-doctors-burying-covid-injections-injuries-and-deaths.html
Our First-Hand ICU Story – What is ACTUALLY Killing People in The Hospital
Covid Injections – Children Notice Memory Loss in Their Parents
https://rumble.com/vlaofd-covid-injections-children-notice-memory-loss-in-their-parents.html
Covid Vaccine-induced Microscopic Blood Clots Creating Permanent Damage
This is a tiny group of the thousands who have been injured or died from the vaccines. Though Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube actively try to block posts from those who have been injured or families sharing memories of loved ones who died from the vaccines, people still find a way to share it.
Go to Facebook and do a search on these hashtags:
#protectyourfamily
#protectyourfamilies
#notrare
#choicematters
This Telegram page is allowing people to share their injuries and losses: https://t.me/covidvaccinevictims
The fact of the matter is, Covid-19, like the annual flu has a death rate of about .2%. When treatment is allowed early, that death rate drops. There are a wide variety of early-stage treatments available that are highly successful. Mandating vaccines is completely uncalled for, violates the Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki and Emergency Use Authorization.
Even with the FDA and Pfizer’s bait-and-switch with the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine EUA extension, and the Pfizer Comirnaty FDA-approved vaccine on August 23, 2021 for identical products, it is unethical and immoral to mandate Covid-19 vaccines. Denying early treatment in order to push unnecessary and dangerous vaccines is medical malpractice and crimes against humanity.
Contrary to what we have been told to believe, vaccines are not the saviors they are purported to be. A deep dive into history reveals vaccines played little to no role in the decline of deaths from infectious diseases, even from smallpox and polio. The sharp decline in deaths occurred before the vaccines were even developed.
1885 – Alfred R. Wallace, LL.D. conducted an analysis of 45 years of data regarding the mandated smallpox vaccine in England. His research revealed that not only were the vaccines ineffective, but they were also deadly and all too often, actually spread smallpox. 1871 was the beginning of the antivax movement after 20 years of mandated vaccine failures proved to the public the vaccines did not work. 33
1970 – Dr. Kass proves vaccines played no role in the 90% drop in deaths from the top infectious diseases in England and Wales- that drop happened before the vaccines were developed. 34
1977 – John and Sonja McKinlay prove vaccines played no role in the 90% drop in deaths from the top infectious diseases in the U.S.- that drop happened before the vaccines were developed. 35
2000 – CDC and John Hopkins admit vaccines played no more than a 1% – 3.5% role in the reduction of deaths from the top infectious disease, stating:
“Thus vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century…nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccine were available.” 36
2012 – CDC admits clean water played a major role in the decrease of deaths from the top infectious diseases. 37
All of these reached the same conclusion, the massive decline in deaths were due to clean water, safe food, better nutrition, plumbing / sewer systems, better hygiene. Stronger bodies are much more able to fight off these diseases. In turn, recovering naturally from diseases provides lifelong immunity from those diseases and stronger immune systems. Natural recovery often provides some extended immunity to other infectious diseases as well.
Big Pharma took credit for that which it did not do…
Big Pharma has a history of using mild and easily treated viruses to push vaccines with the assistance of national health agencies and politicians.
1976 – CDC, FDA, NIH convince the president and nation to take 46 million Swine Flu vaccines by spreading massive fear, though only 1 had died and 5 had caught the virus over an 8-month period. The vaccines caused 25 deaths and left hundreds disabled and the vaccine push ended. “60 Minutes” did an expose in 1979. 38
2009 – Big Pharma makes secret deals with politicians in many European countries – if the WHO declares a level 6 pandemic, the countries agree to spend billions of euros on vaccines.
The WHO changes the definition of “pandemic” – removing the requirements of massive deaths in multiple countries and no one in the world having natural immunity. 39
The WHO then declared the N1H1 virus a level 6 pandemic. It was highly contagious, but very mild and the death rate was only 0.017% (Early treatment had not been withheld). The pandemic declaration forced all those European countries to spend billions on useless and mostly unused vaccines to Big Pharma – and leading to terrible problems of narcolepsy for too many vaccine recipients, including children. 40
Knowledge of all that had occurred to push the vaccines was publicly known, but no one was held accountable. 41
Covid-19 is the 3rd pandemic / epidemic scam over the last 50 years and the worst of the three.
1. Even with early treatment banned by our national health agencies (CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID, HHS), the death rate is .2%. Dr. Fauci aggressively pushed Remdesivir, though it is ineffective and nearly ¼ who take it develop liver or kidney problems. Much of the devastating symptoms attributed to Covid-19 were actually caused by Remdesivir. 42
2. In August 2020, real world data comparing countries that used hydroxychloroquine versus those that had banned it revealed use of HCQ resulted in a 79% lower mortality. In the U.S., over 650,000 have died… 513,500 of those lives could have been saved if lives had been put before politics and greed. 43
3. Massive fraud created a picture of fear using RT-PCR tests with up to 97% false positives. The false data was used to justify worldwide lock downs of businesses, schools and resulted in the loss of millions of small businesses, jobs and education. The CDC admitted in December 2020 the tests were incapable of diagnosing Covid-19, and yet withheld that information from the public. The tests are still being used 20 months since Covid-19 entered the U.S. to push more fraudulent testing, more lock downs, ineffective and health-damaging masks, and above all, pushing dangerous vaccines that have killed more than 55,000 Americans.
4. Leading experts in the medical community throughout the world have faced massive censorship, unable to inform the public on how to build their immune system, the need for early treatment and the most effective treatments available. This has resulted in citizen-led investigations around the world. The most valuable of these investigations is the German “Corona Ausschuss” (Corona Committee), led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Attorney. Dr. Fuellmich has had practicing privileges in both Germany and California for 25 years. Corona Ausschuss began their investigations in July 2020, talking to leading doctors and scientists in their fields from around the world. They are sharing everything they know with any country or group around the world wishing to pursue legal channels to hold accountable everyone involved in creating this fraud, and all who have continued to perpetrate it. 44
This website provides overwhelming evidence of what they have found, as well as the legal actions being taken around the world. The Corona Ausschuss has recorded and shared all depositions with the public. I recommend you study it extensively. If you continue down the path of illegally mandating experimental testing, masks and vaccines, you may well find yourself on the receiving end of just such a lawsuit.
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Lawsuits-C19-False-Claims.html#CC-S63
Oct 2020 – WHO changed the definition of herd immunity – removing natural recovery from the disease as part of creating herd immunity – now pushing just vaccines. 45
The vaccine developers were given immunity and cannot be sued for any harm resulting from the vaccines under the Emergency Use Authorization. On the other hand, Pfizer can be sued for any harm from the use of Comirnaty, which was given FDA approval on August 23, 2021, though those lawsuits are rarely successful due to governments intervening on behalf of vaccine developers.
However, private companies and organizations, as well as government agencies, will and are being sued. That includes hospitals and universities who are making testing, masking and vaccine mandates in direct contradiction to the established science that existed long before Covid-19 appeared. These mandates violate federal law, which supersedes state law and private organizations do not have the authority to ignore these laws.
1 https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/99750
2 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
3 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.16.20065920v2#disqus_thread
4 https://www.recoverytrial.net/files/protocol-archive/recovery-protocol-v6-0-2020-05-14.pdf/@@download
5 https://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A901.1
https://www.lupus.org/news/hydroxychloroquine-treatment-linked-to-healthier-pregnancy-in-women-with-lupus
https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/720225_4
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21221847/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30373678/
6 c19study.com
c19ivermectin.com
https://fcpp.org/2020/11/08/hydroxychloroquine-is-widely-used-around-the-globe/
7 cdc.gov/flu/pdf/freeresources/updated/treating-influenza.pdf
8 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html
9 https://defyccc.com/covid-19-panel-gilead-ties/
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/ten-experts-on-a-nih-covid-19-panel-have-ties-to-companies-involved-in-coronavirus-treatment/
10 https://c19rmd.com/
c19study.com
11 https://thehighwire.com/videos/live-from-event-2021-in-dallas-tx/
12 https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
13 https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
14 https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna
15 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
16 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
17 https://www.thehealthsite.com/news/changes-in-spike-protein-in-covid-variants-can-render-current-vaccines-ineffective-822246/
18 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-27/previous-covid-prevents-delta-infection-better-than-pfizer-shot
https://newsrescue.com/delta-variant-natural-immunity-700-greater-protection-than-shot-data-from-israeli-govt-shows/
19 https://www.thehealthsite.com/news/changes-in-spike-protein-in-covid-variants-can-render-current-vaccines-ineffective-822246/
20 https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/public-health/delta-variant-prevalence-by-state.html
https://deadline.com/2021/08/los-angeles-breakthrough-infections-covid-amount-cases-1234818477/
21 https://newsrescue.com/cdc-director-inadvertently-destroys-argument-for-vaccine-passports-by-surprisingly-saying-vaccines-do-not-prevent-transmission-video/
22 https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/files/coronavirus/covid-19-infection-survey/finalfinalcombinedve20210816.pdf
23 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/keythingstoknow.html
24 https://trialsitenews.com/despite-near-total-vaccination-iceland-experiences-its-worse-dwelta-driven-pandemic-surge/
https://protectaustralianow.wordpress.com/2021/08/10/iceland-covid-19-outbreak-cases-spike-in-worlds-most-vaccinated-country/
25 https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/are-recovered-covid-patients-more-protected-than-the-vaccinated/
26 https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/08/08/israel-hospital-vaccinated.html
27 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997418/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1005517/Technical_Briefing_19.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009243/Technical_Briefing_20.pdf
28 c19study.com
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076020302764?via%3Dihub
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/vitamin-d3-mixed-with- hydroxychloroquine-shows-promise-in-treating-covid-19-study
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf
https://protectingtheconstitution.home.blog/2021/06/03/dr-zelenkos-covid-19-protocol-prophylaxis-preventative-and-treatment/
https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/
https://www.globalresearch.ca/medical-doctor-director-diagnostics-laboratory-presents-cures-covid-exposes-dangers-covid-vaccines/5741876
https://www.cnsnews.com/article/national/susan-jones/physician-tells-senate-ivermectin-covid-wonder-drug-if-you-take-it-you
https://www.newsmax.com/health/health-news/australia-ivermectin-coronavirus-covid/2020/08/08/id/981220/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha2mLz-Xdpg
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(03)00806-5/fulltext
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/
https://www.covidmedicalnetwork.com/webinars/brian-tyson-full-interview.aspx
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/26/craig-kelly-member-of-the-australian-parliament-speaks-to-dr-brian-tyson-about-covid/
29 https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
30 https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
31 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/over-45000-americans-have-died-from-covid-19-jabs-attorney/
https://rumble.com/vlaqzt-medicare-medicaid-billings-reveal-45000-died-covid-injections.html
32 https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download
https://rumble.com/vlf8mr-attorney-reiner-fuellmich-and-dr.-bryan-ardis-covid-19-lawsuits.html
33 https://archive.org/details/b2136140x_201805
34 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30108855?seq=1
35 https://ia800203.us.archive.org/1/items/McKinlayQuestionableContribution/mckinlay-questionable%20contribution.pdf
36 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/106/6/1307
37 https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/history.html
38 https://rumble.com/vfrd37-1976-swine-flu-fraud-60-minutes.html
39 https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/who-changed-definition-influenza-pandemic
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-pandemic-definition-covid-19-explainer/ https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1281081/who-world-health-organisation-coronavirus-latest-swine-flu-covid-19-europe-politics-spt
https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/who-changed-definition-influenza-pandemic
https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/seroprevalence-flu-2009.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/irv.12074
40 https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2012/06/cdc-estimate-global-h1n1-pandemic-deaths-284000
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2012/06/cdc-estimate-global-h1n1-pandemic-deaths-284000
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2013/01/study-puts-global-2009-pandemic-h1n1-infection-rate-24
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2013/01/study-puts-global-2009-pandemic-h1n1-infection-rate-24
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/260m-of-swine-flu-vaccine-to-be-incinerated/
41 https://rumble.com/vdo6fj-profiteers-of-fear.html https://web.archive.org/web/20201011163656if_/https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-health-organization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-flu-companies-analysis-idUSTRE59M3TZ20091023
42 https://pharmaceuticalfraud.com/2021-08-09-fauci-fast-tracked-approval-of-dangerous-drug.html
https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/08/07/doctor-reveals-that-remdesivir-was-the-real-cause-for-many-alleged-covid-19-maladies/
43 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/jail-fauci-massive-international-study-shows-countries-early-hcq-use-79-lower-mortality-rate-huge-talking-120000-american-lives/
44 https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-and-the-new-age-of-censorship-11607381415
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/biden-big-tech-covid-censorship-collusion-is-tip-of-ruling-class-spear-opinion/ar-AAMtgis
https://townhall.com/columnists/johnstossel/2021/08/18/coronavirus-censorship-n2594281
https://www.wsj.com/articles/censorship-coordination-deepens-11626474643
45 https://www.aier.org/article/who-deletes-naturally-acquired-immunity-from-its-website/
Masks are ineffective and in many ways they harm.
It’s a myth that masks prevent viruses from spreading. The overall evidence is clear: Standard cloth and surgical masks offer next to no protection against virus-sized particles or small aerosols.1 The size of a virus particle is much too small to be stopped by a surgical mask, cloth or bandana. A single virion of SARS-CoV-2 is about 60-140 nanometers or 0.1 microns.2 The pore size in a surgical mask is 200-1000x that size. Consider that the CDC website states, “surgical masks do not catch all harmful particles in smoke.” And that the size of smoke particles in a wildfire are ~0.5 microns which is 5x the size of the SARS-CoV-2 virus! Wearing a mask to prevent catching SARS-CoV-2, or similarly sized influenza, is like throwing sand at a chain-link fence: it doesn’t work. There has been one large randomized controlled trial that specifically examined whether masks protect their wearers from the coronavirus. This study found mask wearing “did not reduce, at conventional levels of statistical significance, the incidence of Sars-Cov-2-infection.”3
Consider also, that the existence of more particles does not mean more virus. Research shows less virus does not mean less illness. Dr. Kevin Fennelly, a pulmonologist at the National Heart, Lung and Blood institute debunked the view that larger droplets are responsible for viral transmission. Fennelly wrote:
“current infection control policies are based on the premise that most respiratory infections are transmitted by large respiratory droplets- i.e., larger than 5 [microns] – produced by coughing and sneezing, …Unfortunately, that premise is wrong.”4
Fennelly referenced a 1953 paper on anthrax that showed a single bacterial spore of about one micron was significantly more lethal than larger clumps of spores.5 Exposure to one virus particle is theoretically enough to cause infection and subsequent disease. This is not an alarming thought – it simply means what it has always meant, that our immune system protects us continually all our life.6
There have been hundreds of mask studies related to influenza transmission done over several decades. It is a well-established fact that masks do not stop viruses. “Part of that evidence shows that cloth facemasks actually increase influenza-linked illness.”7 Bacteria are 50x larger than virus particles.8 As such, virus particles can enter through the mask pores, yet bacteria remain trapped inside of the mask, resulting in the mask-wearer continually exposed to the bacteria.
Related to the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic, there was almost universal agreement among experts, that deaths were virtually never caused by the influenza virus itself but resulted directly from severe secondary pneumonia caused by well-known bacterial “pneumopathogens” that colonized the upper respiratory tract.9 Dr. Fauci and his National Institute of Health studied pandemics and epidemics and concluded, “the vast majority of influenza deaths resulted from secondary bacterial pneumonia.”10
All parties mandating the use of facemasks are not only willfully ignoring established science but are engaging in what amounts to a clinical experimental trial. This conclusion is reached by the fact that facemask use and Covid-19 incidence are being reported in scientific opinion pieces promoted by the CDC and others.11 The fact is after reviewing ALL of the studies worldwide, the CDC found “no reduction in viral transmission with the use of face masks.”12
Any intervention, especially one that is prophylactic, must cause fewer harms to the recipient than the infection. The cost-benefit of mandating an investigational face-covering with emerging safety issues is especially difficult to justify. Anthony Fauci was very clear that asymptomatic transmission was not a threat. He stated, “in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person.”13
Wearing respirators come(s) with a host of physiological and psychological burdens. These can interfere with task performances and reduce work efficiency. These burdens can even be severe enough to cause life-threatening conditions if not ameliorated.14 Fifteen years ago, National Taiwan University Hospital concluded that the use of N-95 masks in healthcare workers caused them to experience hypoxemia, a low level of oxygen in the blood, and hypercapnia, an elevation in the blood’s carbon dioxide levels.15 Studies of simple surgical masks found significant reductions in blood oxygen as well. In one particular study, researchers measured blood oxygenation before and after surgeries in 53 surgeons. Researchers found the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels significantly, and the longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the drop in blood oxygen levels.16
Moreover, people with cancer will be at a further risk from hypoxia, as cancer cells grow best in a bodily environment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes systemic inflammation which, in turn, promotes “the growth, invasion and spread of cancers.”17 Repeated episodes of low oxygen, known as intermittent hypoxia, also “causes atherosclerosis” and hence increases “all cardiovascular events” such as heart attacks, as well as adverse cerebral events like stroke.18
Informed consent is required for investigational medical therapies.
Regardless of the lack of safety and efficacy behind the decision to require employees to wear a mask, it is illegal to mandate EUA approved investigational medical therapies without informed consent. Mask use for viral transmission prevention is authorized for Emergency Use only.19 Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA, means “the products are investigational and experimental” only.20 The statute granting the FDA the power to authorize a medical product of emergency use requires that the person being administered the unapproved product be advised of his or her right to refuse administration of the product.21 This statute further recognizes the well-settled doctrine that medical experiments, or “clinical research,” may not be performed on human subjects without the express, informed consent of the individual receiving treatment.22
The right to avoid the imposition of human experimentation is fundamental, rooted in the Nuremberg Code of 1947, has been ratified by the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and further codified in the United States Code of Federal Regulations. In addition to the Unites States regarding itself as bound by these provisions, these principles were adopted by the FDA in its regulations requiring the informed consent of human subjects for medical research.23 In addition, the University of Kentucky’s Office of Research Integrity requires informed consent as “one of the primary ethical considerations underlying research with human subjects”.23-a The law is very clear; It is unlawful to conduct medical research (even in the case of emergency), unless steps are taken to … secure informed consent of all participants.24
Furthermore, by requiring employees to wear a mask, you are promoting the idea that the mask can prevent or treat a disease, which is an illegal deceptive practice. It is unlawful to advertise that a product or service can prevent…disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence… substantiating that the claims are true.25
The FDA EUA for surgical and/or cloth masks explicitly states, “the labeling must not state or imply… that the [mask] is intended for antimicrobial or antiviral protection or related, or for use such as infection prevention or reduction.”26 As you can see from the image, masks do not claim to keep out viruses.
Illegally mandating an investigational medical therapy generates liability.
There are proven microbial challenges as well as breathing difficulties that are created and exacerbated by extended mask-wearing.
Requiring employees to wear a mask sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19, and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, a mask may very well put us at an increased risk of infection, and if so, having a far worse outcome.27
Testing of masks worn for an average of 5.7 hours during the day revealed a multitude of dangerous pathogens, such as:
- Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
- Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
- Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
- Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs—resistant to antibiotics)
- Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
- Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
- Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
- Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)
- Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)
- Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)
Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.28
The fact that mask wearing presents a severe risk of harm to the wearer should – standing alone – not be required for employees, particularly given that we are not ill and have done nothing wrong that would warrant an infringement of our constitutional rights and bodily autonomy. Promoting use of a non-FDA approved, Emergency Use Authorized mask, is unwarranted and illegal. This mandate is in direct conflict with Section 360bbb-3€(1)(A)(ii)(I-III), which requires the wearer to be informed of the option to refuse the wearing of such “device.” Misrepresenting the use of a mask as being intended for antimicrobial or antiviral protection, and/or misrepresenting masks for use as infection prevention or reduction is a deceptive practice under the FTC. It is clear, there is no waiver of liability under deceptive practices, even under a state of emergency. As such, forcing employees to wear masks, or similarly forcing use any other non-FDA approved medical product without the wearer’s consent, is illegal and immoral.
This letter serves as official notice that I do not consent to being forced to wear a mask. I will not fail to take the maximum action permissible under the law against the University, and against you personally. Accordingly, I urge you to comply with Federal and State law, and advise employees they have a right to refuse or wear a mask as a measure to prevent or reduce infection from Covid-19. It is also essential you make it clear to staff, faculty and students the masks are incapable of blocking viruses. Any other course of action is contrary to the law. I am willing to testify as to the veracity of the contents in this document. Please confirm no further pressure will be exerted upon me to follow this illegal mask mandate, and that I will not face any retaliatory disciplinary action.
1 https://www.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4221
2 Berenson, A (November 24, 2020). Unreported Truths about Covid-19 and Lockdowns: Part 3: Masks
3 https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
4 https://www.thelanced.com/journals.lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30323-4/fulltext
5 https://www.thelanced.com/journals.lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30323-4/fulltext
6 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090313150254.htm
7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
8 https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/virus-vs-bacteria-difference
9 The pathology and bacteriology of pneumonia following influenza. Chapter IV, Epidemic respiratory disease. The pneumonias and other infections of the respiratory tract accompanying influenza and measles, 1921 St, LouisCV Mosby (p. 107-281)
10 https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/198/7/962/2192118
11 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover-guidance.html
12 Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures, Jingyi Xiao1, Eunice Y. C. Shiu1, Huizhi Gao, Jessica Y. Wong, Min W. Fong, Sukhyun Ryu, and Benjamin J. Cowling (Volume 26, Number 5, May of 2020).
13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1orSO094uY
14 Arthur Johnson, Journal of Biological Engineering (2016).
15 The Physiological Impact of N95 Masks on Medical Staff, National Taiwan University Hospital (June 2005).
16 Bader A et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia 2008;19:12-126..
17 Aggarwal BB. Nucler factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203-208, and Blaylock RL. Immunoexcitatory mechanisms in glioma proliferation, invasion and occasional metastasis. Surg Neurol Inter 2013;4:15.
18 Savransky V et al. Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces atherosclerosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007;175:1290-1297.
19 https://www.fda.gov/media/137121/download
20 https://ca.childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CDE-Superintendent-Letter0from-Childrens-HealthDefense-California-Chapter.pdf
21 21 U.S.C.§ S360bbb-3 (The FD&C Act)
22 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A) (“Section 360bbb-3”)
23 C.F.R. § 50.20
23-a https://www.research.uky.edu/office-research-integrity/informed-consentassent-process-instructions-informed-consent
24 http://www.invertedalchemy.com/2020/12/belief-is-not-medical-counter-measure.html, 21 C.F.R. § 50.23, 21 C.F.R. §50.20 21 C.F.R. § 50.24
25 FTC Act, 15 U.S. Code § 41
26 https://www.fda.gov/media/137121/download
27 Russell Blaylock, Id. (quoting Shehade H et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 negatively regulates Th1 function. J Immunol 2015;195:1372-1376. See also: Westendorf AM et al. Hypoxia enhances immunosuppression by inhibiting CD4+ effector T cell function and promoting Treg activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;41:1271-84. See further: Sceneay J et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression contributes to the premetastatic niche. Oncoimmunology 2013;2:1 e22355.
28 https://alachuachronicle.com/dangerous-pathogens-found-on-local-residents-face-masks/
https://alachuachronicle.com/mask-reports-from-lab/
I am a retired Veteran of the United States Air Force with a disability rating of 80%. I proudly served my country and meant every word of the oath I took every time I re-enlisted to defend the U.S. from enemies foreign and domestic.
I was also proud to work for the University of Kentucky Medical Center for the last 20 years, providing and maintaining the systems that allowed medical and dental students, as well as medical professionals from the University of Kentucky Hospital, the resources they needed for their education and treatment of patients. However, that sense of pride over the last year has dropped as I watched the University of KY and the UK Medical Center comply with the fraudulent and illegal requirements issued by the CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID and HHS.
Both the University and hospital have always had wonderful reputations as centers for excellent education and medical services. And yet, UK hospital has withheld early, safe and effective treatment for those diagnosed with Covid-19. Both the hospital and the university have great research departments, but both remained silent over the lies being pushed.
Any physician or researcher worth their salt knew full well a 5–10-day prescription for hydroxychloroquine with zinc was perfectly safe for the vast majority of the population. Millions of people have taken billions of doses of hydroxychloroquine for decades with no ill-effect for 65 years.
These same doctors and researchers knew ivermectin is equally safe and a 2 – 3-day dose could only help, not hurt. Ivermectin was developed in the early 1970s and there has never been a whiff of harm by its use.
Both HCQ and ivermectin are and have been on the WHO’s essential medication list for all countries for decades. Being highly effective and very inexpensive, these treatments have been a God-send to all countries, even the poorest in the world. Not having patents, the costs for both are very inexpensive… no one was going to get rich off of their use, especially not Big Pharma.
Numerous studies have proven surgical and cloth masks are completely ineffective at blocking viruses:
1. the viruses are microscopic, with 20 – 50 particles going through each and every weave of a surgical mask
2. the viruses spread through simple breath exhalation, no coughing or sneezing required
3. the tiny amount of moisture surrounding the virus particles quickly evaporates after exhalation, leaving them hanging in the air for hours in areas with poor ventilation, making 6-foot distance separation meaningless.
The CDC admitted in December 2020 the RT-PCR tests cannot diagnose anything, let alone Covid-19. The entire medical community, as well as university scientific researchers, should have been shouting this from the rooftops and refusing to continue spreading fear by performing these useless tests.
Again, these same doctors and researchers know full well anyone under 70 without comorbidities are extremely unlikely to die from Covid-19, even with effective, safe and early treatment being banned. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath. Nurses take some type of oath to do no harm. And yet the vast majority at the UK hospital and University of KY have stayed silent, allowing millions to take dangerous and unnecessary vaccines.
Medical staff at UK hospital have seen those who have died or been injured from the vaccines, and they have stayed silent. Everyone from the very top position to the very lowest should have been putting patients first – not accreditation, not money, not jobs. The excellent reputations of the University of Kentucky as an educational facility, as well as the University of Kentucky Medical Center, have been gravely damaged through their inaction.
Dr. Christina Parks has a Ph.D in cellular and molecular biology. She testified to the Michigan House of Representatives in support of a bill that prohibits certain vaccines, such as the Covid-19 mRNA, as a condition of employment. She stated:
“We cannot mandate something that does not prevent transmission”.
“Vaccine requirements and mandates are based on the faulty assumption that the vaccines in question prevent transmission of the pathogen. They were never designed to do that. They only attenuate symptoms…”
“Recent studies have shown that the vaccinated — especially with the delta variant — and the unvaccinated have similar amounts of virus in their nose and throat.”
Regarding a study by the CDC that tracked a recent Covid outbreak of 469 cases in Massachusetts, she stated:
“74% of the cases occurred in fully vaccinated people and four out of five of those hospitalized were vaccinated.”
“My main complaint is with our health agencies and the CDC who basically know better and are misleading the public.”
She did not protect her career by following the unscientific mandates of our national health agencies. You can watch her testimony at: https://sandrarose.com/2021/08/molecular-biologist-explains-why-mrna-covid-vaccines-should-not-be-mandated/
I will continue to do my job at the Medical Center Library to the best of my ability to ensure everyone has access to all the information available for their education and jobs.
However, I will not wear masks. I will not be tested. And I will not take a Covid-19 vaccine. Frankly, at this point, it is highly unlikely I will ever take another vaccine during the remainder of my life. Big Pharma, the world’s national health agencies and the medical community have made it clear they put profit before people.
I highly recommend you refrain from any retribution or “penalties’ for my refusals. As you have seen throughout this document, lawsuits are springing up all over the U.S. and the world. Retribution of any sort for refusing to comply with illegal mandates or the use of ineffective and dangerous vaccines are perfect grounds for a lawsuit.
Copies of this letter have been sent to the following to ensure a record remains of what has transpired, as well as a copy of the threatening email you sent to the entire staff, faculty and students with your mandate of testing only the unvaccinated, though the vaccinated can also catch and transmit the Delta variant:
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Attorney at Law
Dr. Peter McCullough, MPH, FACP, FACC, FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA
America’s Frontline Doctors Legal Team
Children’s Health Defense Legal Team
Thomas Renz, Attorney at Law
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron
I pray you will choose to allow the faculty, staff and students to make their own life choices before any governmental pressure, any financial incentives and immediately recall all mandates on masks, testing and vaccines.
Sincerely,
The following is the email in which the penalties for non-compliance of testing / vaccination are laid out by the University.
The following is the email my husband sent to the Health Corp and Human Resources at the University of Kentucky demanding full disclosure of the university’s written policy regarding the mandates, as well as all the information they are required, by law, to provide regarding the experimental medical products being used during this 3rd stage of human trials. The experimental products include the RT-PCR testing, masks and vaccines. These trials run through January 2023.
FYI, the FDA sent Pfizer two letters on August 23, 2021. The first was approving, for experimental use, the Pfizer Covid vaccine. The second letter approved Comirnaty, a Covid vaccine. The FDA admits the two vaccines are identical and can be used interchangeably, but have different legal statuses based on how they were approved. It is essential, if you decide to get the Pfizer vaccine, to determine whether you are being given the experimental product or Comirnaty.
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
According to an FDA Q&A, the two injections are identical:
“The FDA-approved Pfizer-BioNTech product Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine under EUA have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns.”
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
Why did the FDA send out 2 different letters with 2 different types of approval for what is essentially the same vaccine? Do they think a name change will encourage more people to get the injections? Is this a bait-and-switch?
Protecting the Constitution 
Leave a comment