For 100 years, it has been an established fact that masks have little to no effect on blocking viruses. Fauci admitted as much in the beginning of the ‘Covid’ pandemic, but then he suddenly did a 180. Only Fauci knows why he has reversed himself on much of established science. Perhaps you will have better luck coming up with an answer after you dig through all this research.
By the way, every link was checked prior to being added to this list. However, if the book burners have found a way to dispose of it, please let me know in the comments below.
January 17, 2021
America’s Frontline Physicians
How Covid is transmitted and information on multiple studies that masks don’t work.
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Masks-Science.pdf
Dutch government will not advise public to wear masks – minister
“The Dutch government on Wednesday said it will not advise the public to wear masks to slow the spread of coronavirus, asserting that their effectiveness has not been proven.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-idUSKCN24U2UJ
January 25, 2021
Reusing masks may increase your risk of coronavirus infection, expert says
“Panic buying and the hoarding of face masks to protect from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may not be a good idea, says a health expert. It puts you at an increased risk of contracting the virus.
Dr. Jenny Harries, England’s deputy chief medical officer, has warned that it was not a good idea for the public to wear facemasks as the virus can get trapped in the material and causes infection when the wearer breathes in.”
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200315/Reusing-masks-may-increase-your-risk-of-coronavirus-infection-expert-says.aspx
Dr. Fauci recommends wearing goggles to prevent catching the coronavirus
“Theoretically you should protect all of the mucosal surfaces, so if you have goggles or an eye shield, you should use it,” he said.
“It’s not universally recommended, but if you really want to be complete, you should probably use it if you can,” he continued. But one reason that this hasn’t been pushed for the general public yet, he suggested, is because, “it’s so easy for people to just make a cloth mask.”
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dr-fauci-recommends-wearing-goggles-to-prevent-catching-the-coronavirus-2020-07-29
Dr. Fauci recommends people wear cloth masks in public, urges caution on coronavirus treatments
“White House coronavirus Task Force member Dr. Anthony Fauci said Friday that the general public should be wearing cloth masks if they cannot keep a safe distance from others.”
“”The better part of valor when you’re out and you can’t maintain that six-foot distance is to wear some type of facial covering.”
I found it bizarre for Fauci to be saying if “you can’t maintain that six-foot distance” than wear a mask, since we are now being told we must do both. If 6 feet is safe, why a mask? If a mask is protection, why 6 feet?
This is an example of how Fauci continually changes the rules.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/anthony-fauci-hydroxychloroquine-use-coronavirus
Wildfire Smoke ‐ Particulate Matter Information
“The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Small particles less than 10 micrometers in diameter pose the greatest problems, because they can get deep into your lungs, and some may even get into your bloodstream. Exposure to such particles can affect both your lungs and your heart. Larger particles are of less concern, although they can irritate your eyes, nose, and throat.”
The Covid virus is .5 micrometers. If Covid masks won’t protect you from the larger wildfire smoke particles, how can it protect your from Covid?
https://dec.alaska.gov/air/air-monitoring/wildfire-smoke-info.aspx
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L384VvNswbA
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/smoke-faq.html
Anti-CV-19 Government Measures Press Conference
Multiple topics, including masks are ineffective at blocking viruses and extensive wearing is harmful to one’s health. Extreme lock downs are detrimental to everyone’s health and is not based on any scientific facts.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/1000-doctors-come-out-against-covid/?fbclid=IwAR1TwQ4m0F3r1T73MGFfqc6bgDntMF5n8r2DCG-fmxTEYJ2IlqTyLQuUWeQ
January 26, 2021
WHO (World Health Organization) Mask Guidelines – June 2020
The WHO occasionally reveals the truth, yet somehow, continues to push an agenda. There seem to be many players involved in trying to make the world believe Covid-19 was as deadly as the Black Plague.
These guidelines overall push the need for everyone to wear masks, while at the same time admitting here and there are no strong studies proving masks are an effective barrier against the spread of Covid-19.
I am providing two copies of the guidelines. The first is the original and the second includes notes of my observations.
Dr. Fauci began pushing masks for everyone in April 2020. The WHO Guidelines above were published 2 months later in June 2020. The analysis below was published in July 2020, 3 months later. Why did Dr. Fauci not revise his aggressive mask recommendations?
Particle sizes of infectious aerosols: implications for infection control – July 24, 2020
“Modeling studies and simulated workplace protection studies in the USA have shown benefits of various types of respirators and little to no protection from surgical masks.”
“Although surgical masks offer little protection from inhaled agents, they have a role in protecting health-care workers when worn by patients.”
“Once direct measurement of particles containing viruses in exhaled breath was technically feasible, most particles (87%) with influenza viral RNA were found to be smaller than 1 μm.”
“Influenza viral RNA was detected in the exhaled breath of 34 (92%) of 37 adults. The fine particles contained 8·8-times (95% CI 4·1–19·0) more viral copies than did the coarse ones.”
“Findings from two studies with comparable particle size data showed that influenza virus in exhaled breath is contained in smaller particles than influenza virus in cough.”
Medical masks can block droplets of 3 micrometers, while the Covid virus is much smaller at .06 – .14 micrometers.
“Several virus types have been detected in exhaled breath condensates using PCR, such as influenza, human rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human papillomavirus, and Torque teno virus. Bacteria have also been detected by PCR in exhaled breath condensates, especially Haemophilus influenzae, and also P aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and meticillin-resistant S aureus. Viral and bacterial pathogens were isolated from exhaled breath condensates in the same patients, including influenza A, respiratory syncytial virus, S aureus, H influenzae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Cladosporium, Alternaria, and Penicillium species have been detected in the exhaled breath condensates of patients with asthma.”
Wearing masks for hours everyday, day after day, the viral and bacterial pathogens build up on the masks with each exhalation, then sucked backed into the lungs – possibly leading to bacterial pneumonia.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30323-4/fulltext
February 4, 2021
NEJM – SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Marine Recruits during Quarantine
Study at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai – Marines – 2-week quarantine at home followed by a second supervised 2-week quarantine at a closed college campus that involved double-layer mask wearing, social distancing, and daily temperature and symptom monitoring.
Those who quarantined had a higher infection rate than those who did not.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717
A New Study Questions Whether Masks Protect Wearers. You Need to Wear Them Anyway.
100 years of studies have proven masks do not block viruses. Yes, they can block much larger particles, but I have yet to see anyone provide a viable study proving surgical masks, let alone cloth masks, can block viruses. Even the WHO has admitted the few that have been produced were biased and incomplete.
This article does not provide any links to viable studies supporting mask wearing, but does repeat the general mantra… wear a mask… wear a mask… wear a mask…
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/health/coronavirus-masks-denmark.html
And let’s not forget the actions of the U.S. politicians – setting mandates for the masses and ignoring those mandates themselves…
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi visits a shutdown hair salon to get her hair done and runs around without a mask.
Senator Dianne Feinstein runs through the airport and Senate hallways without her mask.
Senator Dianne Feinstein gave Senator Lindsey Graham a hug right on t.v. She is obviously not afraid of Covid.
Governor Northam (VA) ran around the beach without a mask, taking close up selfies with others.
Governor Cuomo (NY) runs around the streets of NY without a mask.
Governor Beshear (KY) shutdowns youth sports in KY, but sends his son to a youth camp in Indiana. Then Beshear travels to Indiana to watch his son play – without his mask.
Fauci attends a baseball game and sits in the stadium with his friends – without a mask.
Governor Newsom (CA) attends a fancy birthday party with a dozen people at a fancy restaurant, along with top health officials of CA. No masks, all sitting side by side.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot (Chicago), along with reporters, tear the masks off as soon as the news conference is over, then stand around talking to each – NOT 6 feet apart.
Governor J.B. Pritzker (IL) sent his wife to Florida to wait out the pandemic. He then violated his own stay-at-home orders and sent workman to Wisconsin to work on the house he is building.
Mayor Hancock (Denver) locked his state down, then traveled with his family to Alabama for Thanksgiving.
White House reporters tear their masks off as soon as the news conference is over – no fear of Covid there.
Rep. Harley Rouda (CA) scolded people for being out in public, then went to the beach himself.
So why are all these politicians doing the exact opposite of what they order the people to do?
Because they have quick and easy access to hydroxychloroquine and they know this virus is no more dangerous than the annual flu.
Download your own permission slip to be mask free / lock down free:
And let’s not forget… the WHO admitted Covid is no more deadly than the annual flu…
Many Studies Find That Cloth Masks Do Not Stop Viruses Like COVID
“Fauci and Osterholm were also likely aware of numerous studies concluding that masks during surgery don’t prevent wound infections from particles doctors emitted from their mouths and noses. One study found that tracer particles placed on the inside of a surgeon’s mask ended up in the surgical wound.”
““Maskne,” face rashes, “mask mouth,” and sore throats point to bacteria building up in masks due to the humid, stagnant air and changes in the oral microbiome, which can cause systemic inflammation and downstream disease. A 2015 study found that health-care workers who wore cotton face masks suffered from significantly more respiratory illness than those who wore surgical masks.”
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/many-studies-find-that-cloth-masks-do-not-stop-viruses-like-covid/
COVID-19 Masks Causing Rise In Bacterial Pneumonia
“In February and March we were told not to wear masks. What changed? The science didn’t change. The politics did. This is about compliance. It’s not about science… Our opposition is using low-level retrospective observational studies that should not be the basis for making a medical decision of this nature.”
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-19-masks-causing-rise-in-bacterial-pneumonia/
The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using “tracer particles”.
WOW – studies into surgeons’ bacteria ending up in the surgical area of the patients they operated on. ALL showed the bacteria from the surgeons’ mouths were IN the patients’ surgery area…
MASKS DON’T WORK!!!
They are simply to stop the surgeon from drooling onto the patient or blood spatter from the patient.
“To examine the efficacy of currently used synthetic-fiber disposable face masks in protecting wounds from contamination, human albumin microspheres were employed as “tracer particles,” and applied to the interior of the face mask during 20 operations.
At the termination of each operation, wound irrigates were examined under the microscope. Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments. Since the microspheres were not identified on the exterior of these face masks, they must have escaped around the mask edges and found their way into the wound. The wearing of the mask beneath the headgear curtails this route of contamination.”
https://europepmc.org/article/med/7379387
A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
“We have provided the first clinical efficacy data of cloth masks, which suggest HCWs (Health Care Workers) should NOT use cloth masks as protection against respiratory infection.
Cloth masks resulted in significantly higher rates of infection than medical masks, and also performed worse than the control arm. The controls were HCWs who observed standard practice, which involved mask use in the majority, albeit with lower compliance than in the intervention arms.
The control HCWs also used medical masks more often than cloth masks. When we analyzed all mask-wearers including controls, the higher risk of cloth masks was seen for laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection”
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/5/4/e006577.full.pdf
Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: A controlled study
“It has never been shown that wearing surgical face masks decreases postoperative wound infections. On the contrary, a 50% decrease has been reported after omitting face masks. The present study was designed to reveal any 30% or greater difference in general surgery wound infection rates by using face masks or not.
During 115 weeks, a total of 3,088 patients were included in the study. Weeks were denoted as “masked” or “unmasked” according to a random list. After 1,537 operations performed with face masks, 73 (4.7%) wound infections were recorded and, after 1,551 operations performed without face masks, 55 (3.5%) infections occurred. This difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05) and the bacterial species cultured from the wound infections did not differ in any way, which would have supported the fact that the numerical difference was a statistically “missed” difference.”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736
Particle sizes of infectious aerosols: implications for infection control – July 24, 2020
“Modeling studies and simulated workplace protection studies in the USA have shown benefits of various types of respirators and little to no protection from surgical masks.”
“Although surgical masks offer little protection from inhaled agents, they have a role in protecting health-care workers when worn by patients.”
“Once direct measurement of particles containing viruses in exhaled breath was technically feasible, most particles (87%) with influenza viral RNA were found to be smaller than 1 μm.”
“Influenza viral RNA was detected in the exhaled breath of 34 (92%) of 37 adults. The fine particles contained 8·8-times (95% CI 4·1–19·0) more viral copies than did the coarse ones.”
“Findings from two studies with comparable particle size data showed that influenza virus in exhaled breath is contained in smaller particles than influenza virus in cough.”
Medical masks can block droplets of 3 micrometers, while the Covid virus is much smaller at .06 – .14 micrometers.
“Several virus types have been detected in exhaled breath condensates using PCR, such as influenza, human rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human papillomavirus, and Torque teno virus. Bacteria have also been detected by PCR in exhaled breath condensates, especially Haemophilus influenzae, and also P aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and meticillin-resistant S aureus. Viral and bacterial pathogens were isolated from exhaled breath condensates in the same patients, including influenza A, respiratory syncytial virus, S aureus, H influenzae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Cladosporium, Alternaria, and Penicillium species have been detected in the exhaled breath condensates of patients with asthma.”
Wearing masks for hours everyday, day after day, the viral and bacterial pathogens build up on the masks with each exhalation, then sucked backed into the lungs – possibly leading to bacterial pneumonia.
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2213-2600%2820%2930323-4
Horowitz: Norwegian study shows very little transmission in school without masks, as suicide crisis intensifies
“Shutting down schools or forcing kids to wear masks – either one is likely the greatest crime ever committed against children under the most false pretenses imaginable. New research continues to show that schools are not drivers of spread, not to mention the fact that the virus is not dangerous to children. Meanwhile, children continue to commit suicide in record numbers. This is the evil cost of adult virtue-signaling.”
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/ready-horowitz-norwegian-study-shows-very-little-transmission-in-school-without-masks-as-suicide-crisis-intensifies
Comparison of the Filter Efficiency of Medical Nonwoven Fabrics against Three Different Microbe Aerosols (October 2017)
“Currently, there is no standard method for evaluating the protective performance of nonwoven fabrics used in surgical masks against viral aerosols, although there are standard methods for testing fabrics against bacterial aerosols using Staphylococcus aureus… which is larger than virus particles.”
“Another study found that surgical masks had about 85% penetration ratio of aerosolized inactivated influenza particles and about 90% of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, although S aureus particles were about 6x the diameter of influenza particles.”
“Among the three types of spherical microbe particles, the filter efficiency against influenza virus particles… approximately 120 nm (.12 microns) was the lowest…” Surgical masks cannot block anything smaller than 3 microns, cloth masks are less able to block viruses.
“We conclude that the filter efficiency test using the phi-X174 phage aerosol may overestimate the protective performance of nonwoven fabrics with filter structure compared to that against real pathogens such as the influenza virus.”
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/23/2/23_61/_pdf/-char/en
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel – A Randomized Clinical Trial
“… 2,371 completed the study and accounted for 5,180 HCP (health care personnel) seasons.”
| N95 Mask | Medical Mask Group | |
| Laboratory-confirmed influenza infections | 207 | 193 |
| Acute respiratory illness | 1,556 | 1,711 |
| Laboratory-detected respiratory infections | 679 | 745 |
| Laboratory-confirmed respiratory illness | 371 | 417 |
| Influenza-like illness events | 128 | 166 |
Conclusions and Relevance: Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
Comparison of Filtration Efficiency and Pressure Drop in Anti-Yellow Sand Masks, Quarantine Masks, Medical Masks, General Masks, and Handkerchiefs
“General masks, regardless of their material, showed little protection against the tested aerosols, even when they had a fancy brand name (i.e., Best Nano, Ultra Antibiotic, Anytime Guard, Hygiene). The average penetration values of nine tested general masks were 62.4% with the KFDA protocol and 63.1% with the NIOSH protocol, respectively (Table 2).
Nonwoven material showed about 50% penetration while masks made of cotton displayed over 70% penetration (Table 3). Handkerchiefs demonstrated very little protection against the tested aerosols. Penetration was over 95% when tested with the KFDA protocol, decreasing to 87–91% when three and four layers were used. More handkerchief layers meant less penetration, but the filtration effect was small even when a well-folded handkerchief was used.”
“In this study, the penetration efficiency of medical masks ranged from 10% to 90%, except for one product (certified as a N95 class), which showed 1.82% penetration. Other studies also reported that penetration ranged from 10% to 47% in dental masks and 53% to 96% in surgical masks (Oberg and Brosseau, 2008).”
https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-13-06-oa-0201.pdf
Protecting the Constitution 
Leave a comment